Smartsheet is one of the most popular work management platforms in use today. Many facility managers have adopted it for everything from maintenance tracking to vendor management - largely because it is flexible, familiar, and already deployed in their organizations. But using Smartsheet for vendor accountability is a classic case of a general-purpose tool being stretched beyond its intended purpose. Here is the honest comparison.
What Is Smartsheet?
Smartsheet is a collaborative work management platform built around spreadsheet-style grids, project timelines, dashboards, and automation. It is exceptionally flexible - you can build almost any workflow in it. That flexibility is both its strength and the source of its limitations in vendor management.
Smartsheet has no native concept of a vendor scorecard, a KPI framework, or a performance review cycle. You can build those things in Smartsheet, but you are building them from scratch - and then maintaining them as your needs evolve.
What Is Evalystar?
Evalystar is purpose-built. It comes with a vendor accountability framework out of the box: defined KPI categories, structured scoring, review cycle management, performance trend tracking. You are not building the system - you are configuring and using it.
The practical difference: getting vendor accountability working in Smartsheet takes weeks of setup and ongoing maintenance. Getting it working in Evalystar takes hours.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Evalystar | Smartsheet |
|---|---|---|
| Native vendor scorecards | ✅ Yes | ❌ Build from scratch |
| Performance trend analysis | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Manual/custom |
| Review cycle management | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Manual setup |
| Multi-site vendor comparison | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Complex custom build |
| General project management | ❌ No | ✅ Excellent |
| Workflow automation | ⚠️ Basic | ✅ Strong |
| Collaboration features | ⚠️ Basic | ✅ Strong |
| Setup time for vendor tracking | ✅ Hours | ⚠️ Weeks |
| Ongoing maintenance required | ✅ Low | ⚠️ Medium-high |
The Hidden Cost of Flexibility
Smartsheet's flexibility means facility managers often spend more time maintaining their vendor tracking system than actually using it. The scoring formula breaks when a new vendor is added. The dashboard needs updating when KPIs change. Someone inevitably starts inputting data in a different format.
Evalystar eliminates this because the structure is pre-built and maintained by the product.
Where Smartsheet Wins
Smartsheet wins as a general work management platform - project tracking, cross-functional collaboration, process automation. If your organization is already on Smartsheet and you have light vendor tracking needs, building a basic tracker there may be the pragmatic starting point.
Where Evalystar Wins
Evalystar wins when vendor accountability needs to be rigorous - when you need consistent scoring, trend data, and documentation that holds up in a renewal review. Smartsheet can approximate this; Evalystar delivers it natively. It also reaches beyond the facility manager entering scores: operations leaders overseeing multiple sites get a roll-up view instead of stitching together separate sheets, and procurement gets renewal-ready documentation instead of a spreadsheet nobody trusts.
Bottom Line
Using Smartsheet for vendor accountability is building a race car from a kit - technically possible, but you will spend most of your time on the build rather than the race. Evalystar is the race car, ready to go. For facility managers who need real vendor accountability, the choice is clear.
Get vendor accountability working today, not next month: start a 30-day free trial